Skip to main content

Role of Stereotaxis in Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Tumors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Breast Cancer

Abstract

Breast stereotaxis developed by a Swedish radiologist and a Finish engineer was first deployed in early 1980s as a clinical tool in Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden. Its emergence as a diagnostic device followed the popularization of screening mammography for early detection of breast cancer (Moskowiz Am J Roentgenol 136:735–738, 1981; Baker CA Cancer J Clin 32:194–225, 1982; Spivey et al. Am Surg 48:326–332, 1982). Women with mammographic abnormalities underwent wire localization and open biopsy for diagnosis of cancer when an abnormality was detected. Only 20 % of these shadows were proven to be malignant on subsequent histologic examination. Thus four of five patients underwent stressful experience of unnecessary surgery and associated cost. In 1985 the author (KD) travelled to Karolinska, evaluated the technology, and learned its application. The Swedish investigators reported on 2,594 patients whose breast lesions had been biopsied with a fine needle and noted suspicious lesions in 22.7 % of cases. Subsequent excisional biopsy proved the true positives to be 17.5 %. The author then observed its utility by a gynecologist at the University of Kiel in West Germany who reported on 528 patients with an accuracy of 92 %. The technology was then introduced into the United States at the University of Chicago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nordenstrom B, Zajicek J. Sterotaxic needle biopsy and preoperative indication of nonpalpable mammary lesions. Acta Cytol. 1977;21:350–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moskowiz M. Mammographic screening: significance of minimal breast cancers. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136:735–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker L. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin. 1982;32(4):194–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spivey G, Perry B, et al. Predicting the risk of cancer at the time of breast biopsy. Am Surg. 1982;48:326–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bassett L, Liu TH, et al. The prevalence of carcinoma in palpable vs impalpable, mammographically detected lesions. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:21–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Azevado E, Svane G, et al. Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non-palpable lesions. Lancet. 1989;1:1033–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowlatshahi K, Gent H, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with stereotaxic localization and fine-needle aspiration. Radiology. 1989;170(2):427–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dowlatashahi K, Yaremko ML, et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology. 1991;181(3):745–50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parker SH, Lovin JD, et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology. 1991;180:403–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker SH, Burbank F, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 1994;193:359–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Helbich TH, Rudas M, et al. Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge biopsy needles. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:59–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitlock J, Evans A, et al. Digital imaging improves upright stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(5):374–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Becker L, Taves D, et al. Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications: comparison of film versus digital mammography, both using add-on unit. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177: 1451–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds HE, Poon CM, et al. Biopsy of breast microcalcifications using an 11-guage directional vacuum assisted device. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1503–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Helbich TH, Matzek W, et al. Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:383–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saslow D, Boetes C, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bkeicher RJ, Morrow M. MRI and breast cancer: role in detection, diagnosis, and staging. Oncology. 2007;21(12):1521–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Bick U, et al. International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathalogically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:531–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berg WA, Madsen KS, et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2007;258(1):59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the mammotome. Am Surg. 1996;62:738–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dowlatshahi K, Francescatti DS, et al. Laser therapy for small breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2002;184:359–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Burak WE, Agnese DM, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of invasive breast carcinoma followed by delayed surgical excision. Cancer. 2003;98(7):1369–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sabek MS, Kaufman CS, et al. Cryoablation of early-stage breast cancer: work-in-progress report of a multi-institutional trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(5):542–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bloom KJ, Dowlat K, et al. Pathalogic changes after interstitial laser therapy of infiltrating breast carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2001;182(4):384–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kambiz Dowlatshahi M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dowlatshahi, K., Katz, A. (2014). Role of Stereotaxis in Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Tumors. In: Francescatti, D., Silverstein, M. (eds) Breast Cancer. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8063-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8063-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8062-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8063-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics