Abstract
The digital divide policy conversation focuses on connectivity and access to information and communication technologies as well as on the ability to use them in pre-prescribed ways and on the utility that their usage provides according to preset categories.However, the dynamics offered by van Dijk (2005) demonstrate that categorical inequalities permeate over time and lead to an ongoing divide that never closes. A shift in policy thinking is needed. Applying a philosophy rooted in the writings of John Rawls to replace the current utilitarian framework, we suggest to focus remedial policies on the least advantaged members of society, those whose positional categorization led to the lowest levels of digital participation. We then propose to measure success of the policy by its responsiveness to the needs of the excluded citizens as they themselves define them. Adopting Amartya Sen's “capabilities approach,” we posit that an effective policy should focus on a person’s actual capability to make use of the goods, services and opportunities available to them, rather than on the mere access to or ownership of those goods.
This study has been supported by a Career Integration Grant awarded by the Marie Curie FP7 program of the European Union (project #322207) and by the I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 1716/12). All authors contributed equally to this study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bentham, J. (1789/1995). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Constitution of Greece. (2009). Article 5A(2). Retrieved from http://www.hellenicparliament.gr/UserFiles/f3c70a23-7696-49db-9148-f24dce6a27c8/001-156%20aggliko.pdf
Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., & Bacao, F. (2012). Digital divide across the European Union. Information & Management, 49(6), 278–291.
Dollar D., & Kraay, A. (2000). Growth is good for the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank. Accessed at http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-2587
Fabun, D. (1968). Communications, the transfer of meaning. Glencoe, IL: Glencoe Press.
Garnham, N. (2001). Universal service. In W. Melody (Ed.), Telecom reform: Principles, policies and regulatory practices (pp. 199–204). Lyngsby: Technical University of Denmark.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942/864
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.
Jansen, J. (2010). Use of the internet in higher-income households. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Available at http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Better-off-households.aspx
London Times. (2009, June 12). Top French court declares internet access “basic human right.” Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/story/2009/06/12/top-french-court-declares-internet-access-basic-human-right/
Mill, J. (1863). Utilitarianism (Alex Catalogue of Electronic Texts) (1863). Available at http://infomotions.com/etexts/philosophy/1800-1899/mill-utilitarianism-218.htm
Mueller, M. (1997). Universal service. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Napoli, P. (1999). The unique nature of communications regulation: Evidence and implications for communications policy analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(4), 565–581.
NTIA. (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. A report on Americans’ access to technology tools. Available at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/legacy/ntiahome/fttn00/falling.htm
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Rawls, J. (1999). In S. Freeman (Ed.), Collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). In E. Kelly (Ed.), Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Reuters. (2009, November 17). Spain govt to guarantee legal right to broadband. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/11/17/spaintelecoms-idUSLH61554320091117
Riesinger, D. (2009, October 14). Finland makes 1 Mb broadband access a legal right. CNET. Retrieved from http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10374831-2.html
Schejter, A. (2009). “From all my teachers I have grown wise, and from my students more than anyone else”: What lessons can the US learn from broadband policies in Europe? International Communication Gazette, 71(5), 429–445.
Schejter, A., Ben Harush, O., & Tirosh, N. (2015). “Nothing is ever truly new”: The persisting digital exclusion in Israel, 2002–2013. A Paper Presented at TPRC 43—the 43rd Research Conference on Communications, Information and Internet Policy. George Mason University School of Law, Arlington, VA, 25–27 September, 2015.
Schejter, A., & Tirosh, N. (2014). New media policy: The redistribution of voice. In Y. Liu & R. Picard (Eds.), Policy and marketing strategies for digital media (pp. 73–86). London: Routledge.
Schejter, A., & Tirosh, N. (2015). “Seek the meek, seek the just”: Social media and social justice. Telecommunications Policy, 39, 112–126.
Schejter, A., & Tirosh, N. (2016). A justice-based approach for new media policy: In the oaths of righteousness. London: Palgrave.
Schejter, A., & Yemini, M. (2007). ‘Justice, and only justice, you shall pursue:’ Network neutrality, the First Amendment and John Rawls’ theory of justice. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 14(1), 137–174.
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362.
Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? In S. M. McMurring (Ed.), Tanner lectures on human values (Vol. I, pp. 197–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1989/2003). Development as capability expansion. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. Shiva Kumar (eds.) Readings in human development. New Delhi and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Srinuan, C., & Bohlin, E. (2011). Understanding the digital divide: A literature survey and ways forward. 22nd European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS2011), Budapest, 18–21 September, 2011: Innovative ICT Applications—Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52191
Sunstein, C. (1997). Free markets and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Talukdar, D., & Gauri, D. (2011). Home internet access and usage in the USA: Trends in the socio-economic digital divide. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(7), 85–98.
Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA, London and Delhi: Sage.
Van Dijk, J. (2009). One Europe, digitally divided. In A. Chadwick & P. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 288–304). London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326.
Wei, K., Teo, H., Chan, H., & Tan, B. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170–187.
Wiley, H. (2013). Communication as a transfer of information: Measurement, mechanism and meaning. In U. Stegmann (Ed.), Animal communication theory: Information and influence (pp. 113–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woodward, C. (2003, July 1). Estonia, where being wired is a human right. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0701/p07s01-woeu.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schejter, A., Ben-Harush, O., Tirosh, N. (2017). The Effect of the Transformation in Digital Media on the Digital Divide. In: Friedrichsen, M., Kamalipour, Y. (eds) Digital Transformation in Journalism and News Media. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27786-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27786-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27785-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27786-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)