Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Customer Experience Diffusion on Social Networking Services by Big Data Analytics

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social networking services (e.g., Facebook and Twitter) are playing a significant role of interacting with customers. In particular, most of businesses are trying to exploit such social networking services for more profit, since it has dramatically become an information carrier for customers who are disseminating latest information about products and services. Thus, this study examines how information shared by companies is distributed and what the important factors in understanding information dissemination are. More importantly, this study classifies the types of tweets posted by a company and then to investigate the effect of these types of tweets on diffusion. By using content analysis, this study defined three types, which are i) information provision (IF), ii) advertisement (AD), and iii) both (IFAD), with 8 specific concepts. These results indicate that the differences are significant for all three types of information content. It shows that companies can spread information more quickly by providing the IFAD type rather than the AD type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bajwa DS, Lewis LF, Pervan G, Lai VS, Munkvold BE, Schwabe G (2008) Factors in the global assimilation of collaborative information technologies: an exploratory investigation in five regions. J Manag Inf Syst 25(1):131–166. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes SJ, Böhringer M (2011) Modeling use continuance behavior in microblogging services: the case of twitter. J Comput Inf Syst 51(4):1–10. doi:10.1080/08874417.2011.11645496

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bello-Orgaz G, Jung JJ, Camacho D (2016) Social big data: recent achievements and new challenges. Information Fusion 28:45–59. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berinato S, Clark J (2010) Six ways to find value in twitter’s noise. Harv Bus Rev 88(6):34–35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boettger RK, Palmer LA (2010) Quantitative content analysis: its use in technical communication. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 53(4):346–357. doi:10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brancheau JC, Wetherbe JC (1990) The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Info Sys Research 1(2):115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatman EA (1986) Diffusion theory: a review and test of a conceptual model in information diffusion. J Am Soc Inf Sci 37(6):377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung CM, Lee MK, Rabjohn N (2008) The impact of electronic word-of-mouth. Internet Research 18(3):229–247. doi:10.1108/10662240810883290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer E, Reuber AR (2011) Social interaction via new social media: (how) can interactions on twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior? J Bus Ventur 26(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fullwood C, Sheehan N, Nicholls W (2009) Blog function revisited: a content analysis of myspace blogs. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12(6):685–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greer CF, Ferguson DA (2011) Using twitter for promotion and branding: a content analysis of local television twitter sites. J Broadcast Electron Media 55(2):198–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ha L, James EL (1998) Interactivity reexamined: a baseline analysis of early business web sites. J Broadcast Electron Media 42(4):457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jansen BJ, Zhang M, Sobel K, Chowdury A (2009) Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60(11):2169–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung JJ (2016) Exploiting geotagged resources for spatial clustering on social network services. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 28(4):1356–1367. doi:10.1002/cpe.3634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 53(1): 59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koo C, Wati Y, Jung JJ (2011) Examination of how social aspects moderate the relationship between task characteristics and usage of social communication technologies (scts) in organizations. Int J Inf Manag 31(5):445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47 (260):583–621

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee N, Jung JJ (2014) Content-based analytics of diffusion on social big data: a case study on korean telecommunication companies. In: Jung JJ, Badica C, Kiss A (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on scalable information systems (INFOSCALE2014), Seoul, South Korea, September 25–26, 2014, revised selected papers, lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering, vol 139. Springer, pp 13–27

  19. Lee O, Jung JE (2017) Sequence clustering-based automated rule generation for adaptive complex event processing. Futur Gener Comput Syst 66:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin JS, Peña J (2011) Are you following me? A content analysis of tv networks’ brand communication on twitter. J Interact Advert 12(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miaskiewicz T, Monarchi DE (2008) A review of the literature on the empathy construct using cluster analysis. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 22(7)

  22. Morris R (1994) Computerized content analysis in management research: a demonstration of advantages & limitations. J Manag 20(4):903–931

    Google Scholar 

  23. Naaman M, Boase J, Lai CH (2010) Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp 189–192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen DT, Jung JE (2017) Real-time event detection for online behavioral analysis of big social data. Futur Gener Comput Syst 66:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen DT, Jung JJ (2015) Real-time event detection on social data stream. Mobile Networks and Applications 20(4):475–486. doi:10.1007/s11036-014-0557-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Punj G, Stewart DW (1983) Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application. J Mark Res 20(2):134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rogers EM (1983) The diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Savage N (2011) Twitter as medium and message. Commun ACM 54(3):18–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Segars AH, Grover V (1999) Profiles of strategic information systems planning. Inf Syst Res 10(3):199–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simmons LL, Mukhopadhyay S, Conlon S, Yang J (2011) A computer aided content analysis of online reviews. J Comput Inf Syst 52(1):43–55

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sledgianowski D, Kulviwat S (2009) Using social network sites: the effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. J Comput Inf Syst 49(4):74–83

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smith BG (2010) Socially distributing public relations: twitter, Haiti, and interactivity in social media. Public Relat Rev 36(4):329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G (2011) Sentiment in twitter events. J Am Soc Inf Sci 62(2):406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Trung DN, Jung JJ (2014) Sentiment analysis based on fuzzy propagation in online social networks: a case study on tweetscope. Comput Sci Inf Syst 11(1):215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuong TN, Camacho D, Jung JJ (2017) Identifying and ranking cultural heritage resources on geotagged social media for smart cultural tourism services. Pers Ubiquit Comput. doi:10.1007/s00779-016-0992-y

    Google Scholar 

  36. Watts SA, Zhang W (2008) Capitalizing on content: information adoption in two online communities. J Assoc Inf Syst 9(2):3

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang J, Counts S (2010) Predicting the speed, scale, and range of information diffusion in twitter. In: Cohen WW, Gosling S (eds) Proceedings of the fourth international conference on weblogs and social media, ICWSM 2010, Washington, pp 10–20

  38. Zhao D, Rosson MB (2009) How and why people twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work. ACM, New York, pp 243–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2014R1A2A2A050-07154).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jai E. Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piccialli, F., Jung, J.E. Understanding Customer Experience Diffusion on Social Networking Services by Big Data Analytics. Mobile Netw Appl 22, 605–612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0803-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0803-8

Keywords

Navigation