Abstract
Social networking services (e.g., Facebook and Twitter) are playing a significant role of interacting with customers. In particular, most of businesses are trying to exploit such social networking services for more profit, since it has dramatically become an information carrier for customers who are disseminating latest information about products and services. Thus, this study examines how information shared by companies is distributed and what the important factors in understanding information dissemination are. More importantly, this study classifies the types of tweets posted by a company and then to investigate the effect of these types of tweets on diffusion. By using content analysis, this study defined three types, which are i) information provision (IF), ii) advertisement (AD), and iii) both (IFAD), with 8 specific concepts. These results indicate that the differences are significant for all three types of information content. It shows that companies can spread information more quickly by providing the IFAD type rather than the AD type.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bajwa DS, Lewis LF, Pervan G, Lai VS, Munkvold BE, Schwabe G (2008) Factors in the global assimilation of collaborative information technologies: an exploratory investigation in five regions. J Manag Inf Syst 25(1):131–166. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250106
Barnes SJ, Böhringer M (2011) Modeling use continuance behavior in microblogging services: the case of twitter. J Comput Inf Syst 51(4):1–10. doi:10.1080/08874417.2011.11645496
Bello-Orgaz G, Jung JJ, Camacho D (2016) Social big data: recent achievements and new challenges. Information Fusion 28:45–59. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005
Berinato S, Clark J (2010) Six ways to find value in twitter’s noise. Harv Bus Rev 88(6):34–35
Boettger RK, Palmer LA (2010) Quantitative content analysis: its use in technical communication. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 53(4):346–357. doi:10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450
Brancheau JC, Wetherbe JC (1990) The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Info Sys Research 1(2):115–143
Chatman EA (1986) Diffusion theory: a review and test of a conceptual model in information diffusion. J Am Soc Inf Sci 37(6):377–386
Cheung CM, Lee MK, Rabjohn N (2008) The impact of electronic word-of-mouth. Internet Research 18(3):229–247. doi:10.1108/10662240810883290
Fischer E, Reuber AR (2011) Social interaction via new social media: (how) can interactions on twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior? J Bus Ventur 26(1):1–18
Fullwood C, Sheehan N, Nicholls W (2009) Blog function revisited: a content analysis of myspace blogs. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12(6):685–689
Greer CF, Ferguson DA (2011) Using twitter for promotion and branding: a content analysis of local television twitter sites. J Broadcast Electron Media 55(2):198–214
Ha L, James EL (1998) Interactivity reexamined: a baseline analysis of early business web sites. J Broadcast Electron Media 42(4):457–474
Jansen BJ, Zhang M, Sobel K, Chowdury A (2009) Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60(11):2169–2188
Jung JJ (2016) Exploiting geotagged resources for spatial clustering on social network services. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 28(4):1356–1367. doi:10.1002/cpe.3634
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 53(1): 59–68
Koo C, Wati Y, Jung JJ (2011) Examination of how social aspects moderate the relationship between task characteristics and usage of social communication technologies (scts) in organizations. Int J Inf Manag 31(5):445–459
Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47 (260):583–621
Lee N, Jung JJ (2014) Content-based analytics of diffusion on social big data: a case study on korean telecommunication companies. In: Jung JJ, Badica C, Kiss A (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on scalable information systems (INFOSCALE2014), Seoul, South Korea, September 25–26, 2014, revised selected papers, lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering, vol 139. Springer, pp 13–27
Lee O, Jung JE (2017) Sequence clustering-based automated rule generation for adaptive complex event processing. Futur Gener Comput Syst 66:100–109
Lin JS, Peña J (2011) Are you following me? A content analysis of tv networks’ brand communication on twitter. J Interact Advert 12(1):17–29
Miaskiewicz T, Monarchi DE (2008) A review of the literature on the empathy construct using cluster analysis. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 22(7)
Morris R (1994) Computerized content analysis in management research: a demonstration of advantages & limitations. J Manag 20(4):903–931
Naaman M, Boase J, Lai CH (2010) Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp 189–192
Nguyen DT, Jung JE (2017) Real-time event detection for online behavioral analysis of big social data. Futur Gener Comput Syst 66:137–145
Nguyen DT, Jung JJ (2015) Real-time event detection on social data stream. Mobile Networks and Applications 20(4):475–486. doi:10.1007/s11036-014-0557-0
Punj G, Stewart DW (1983) Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application. J Mark Res 20(2):134–148
Rogers EM (1983) The diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York
Savage N (2011) Twitter as medium and message. Commun ACM 54(3):18–20
Segars AH, Grover V (1999) Profiles of strategic information systems planning. Inf Syst Res 10(3):199–232
Simmons LL, Mukhopadhyay S, Conlon S, Yang J (2011) A computer aided content analysis of online reviews. J Comput Inf Syst 52(1):43–55
Sledgianowski D, Kulviwat S (2009) Using social network sites: the effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. J Comput Inf Syst 49(4):74–83
Smith BG (2010) Socially distributing public relations: twitter, Haiti, and interactivity in social media. Public Relat Rev 36(4):329–335
Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G (2011) Sentiment in twitter events. J Am Soc Inf Sci 62(2):406–418
Trung DN, Jung JJ (2014) Sentiment analysis based on fuzzy propagation in online social networks: a case study on tweetscope. Comput Sci Inf Syst 11(1):215–228
Tuong TN, Camacho D, Jung JJ (2017) Identifying and ranking cultural heritage resources on geotagged social media for smart cultural tourism services. Pers Ubiquit Comput. doi:10.1007/s00779-016-0992-y
Watts SA, Zhang W (2008) Capitalizing on content: information adoption in two online communities. J Assoc Inf Syst 9(2):3
Yang J, Counts S (2010) Predicting the speed, scale, and range of information diffusion in twitter. In: Cohen WW, Gosling S (eds) Proceedings of the fourth international conference on weblogs and social media, ICWSM 2010, Washington, pp 10–20
Zhao D, Rosson MB (2009) How and why people twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work. ACM, New York, pp 243–252
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2014R1A2A2A050-07154).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piccialli, F., Jung, J.E. Understanding Customer Experience Diffusion on Social Networking Services by Big Data Analytics. Mobile Netw Appl 22, 605–612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0803-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0803-8