Trends in Ecology & Evolution
ReviewTinbergen's four questions: an appreciation and an update
Section snippets
Origins of Tinbergen's questions
In a famous paper dedicated to Konrad Lorenz on his 60th birthday, Niko Tinbergen [1] recognised that biologists working on behaviour focus on different types of problem. Some want to know, for instance, how the expression of a particular character is controlled, whereas others want to know how it benefits the organism. Tinbergen pointed out that four fundamentally different types of problem are raised in biology, which he listed as ‘survival value’, ‘ontogeny’, ‘evolution’, and ‘causation’.
What is it for?
Tinbergen [1] devoted a substantial proportion of his paper to investigation of the function of a character (what we refer to here as its ‘current utility’), because he felt that this aspect of ethology had been neglected. Tinbergen's own research group showed how hypotheses about current utility could be tested through experimentation [11], and he would no doubt have been delighted to see how his pioneering work has blossomed into one of the most vigorous and productive fields of behavioural
How did it develop?
Although Tinbergen is credited with stimulating research into behavioural development through his inclusion of ontogeny in his list of problems, he himself carried out little research on this topic. However, developmental ethologists and psychobiologists (such as Gottlieb, Hinde, Hogan, Kruijt, Marler, and ten Cate) formed strong links, leading to productive investigations of topics such as attachment, filial and sexual imprinting, and bird song 26, 27.
However, critical issues have arisen over
How did it evolve?
The past 50 years have witnessed major developments in understanding the evolution of behaviour, derived through the development of sophisticated theoretical tools, such as comparative statistical methods used to construct phylogenies, as well as experimental investigations of natural and artificial selection. Despite this progress, of all the problems identified by Tinbergen, evolutionary questions have been the subject of most discussion. Tinbergen thought that the main issue was to do with
How does it work?
In 1963, Tinbergen lamented the plurality of fields that explored the mechanistic bases of behaviour, and called for a multilevel analysis ‘ranging from the behaviour of the individual and even of supra-individual societies all the way down to Molecular Biology’ ([1] p. 416; see also [60]). The links between the levels of analysis remained relatively tenuous for many years, but more recently enormous strides have been made in understanding the molecular, neurobiological, and hormonal bases of
Inter-relations between the four problems
Tinbergen's questions are not the only questions that can usefully be asked about behaviour and, over the years, many candidate ‘fifth questions’ have been proposed (Box 1). Nonetheless, Tinbergen's questions retain a deserved prominence. Tinbergen regarded his distinctions as being pragmatic, but in many respects they are also logical: answers to any one of Tinbergen's questions cannot be regarded as also answering another [65].
The importance of this issue does not imply that each of
Concluding remarks
The above considerations lead us to several practical recommendations (Box 2), designed to retain the spirit of Tinbergen's objectives but update them in the light of insights garnered over the past 50 years. Tinbergen saw a great advantage in addressing all four of his problems. He wrote: ‘a comprehensive, coherent science of Ethology has to give equal attention to each of them and to their integration’ ([1], p. 411). Therefore, he would have been disappointed that much behavioural work
Acknowledgements
Research supported in part by an ERC Advanced grant to K.N.L. We are grateful to Melissa Bateson, Neeltje Boogert, Gillian Brown, Cara Evans, Tom Morgan, Luke Rendell, Peter Slater, Chris Templeton, and Carel ten Cate for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
References (83)
The genetical evolution of social behavior I
J. Theor. Biol.
(1964)A first formal link between the Price equation and an optimization program
J. Theor. Biol.
(2002)- et al.
Social learning in insects: from miniature brains to consensus building
Curr. Biol.
(2007) Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin's last idea
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2006)Macroevolution of ecosystem engineering, niche construction and diversity
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2008)Phenotypic plasticity's impacts on diversification and speciation
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2010)The impact of learning on sexual selection and evolution
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2012)Evolution, brain, and the nature of language
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2013)- et al.
A critique of the neuroecology of learning and memory
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2001) - et al.
Integrating function and mechanism
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2009)
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later
Trends Cogn. Sci.
On aims and methods of ethology
Zeitschr. Tierpsychol.
Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide
Cause and effect in biology
Science
Function and Evolution of Behavior
More on how and why: cause and effect in biology revisited
Biol. Philos.
Evolution: The Modern Synthesis
A critique of Konrad Lorenz's theory of instinctive behavior
Q. Rev. Biol.
The Tinbergen Legacy
Niko's Nature
Egg shell removal by the black-headed gull, Larus ridibundus: a behaviour component of camouflage
Behaviour
An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology
Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis
Nat. Rev. Genet.
The Plausibility of Life
Developmental Plasticity and Evolution
Social Learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods and Models
Adaptation and Natural Selection
Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form
Paleobiology
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossion paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B
Culture and the Evolutionary Process
Seven types of adaptationism
Biol. Philos.
Adaptionism: 30 years after Gould and Lewontin
Evolution
Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level
Nat. Rev. Genet.
Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations
Maternal Effects as Adaptations
Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution
Evolution in Four Dimensions
Ecological Developmental Biology: Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine, and Evolution
Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution
Nat. Rev. Genet.
Cited by (0)
- *
The authors contributed equally to the article.