Abstract
Following the early work of James, mainstream social psychological approaches to the self have, first, treated individuals and society as separable and distinguishable entities and, second, located the psychology of the self within the individual. From a critical perspective, selves should instead be viewed as constructions that people produce in interactions with others to accomplish social outcomes, such as accounting for and justifying their actions, criticising other people, or otherwise. Rather than being properties of individuals, selves can more usefully be understood as descriptions that are produced in talk and occasioned in local social contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Allport, G. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bates, C. F. (2015). ‘I am a waste of breath, of space, of time’: Metaphors of self in a pro-anorexia group. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 189–204.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Making millions: English, indexicality and fraud. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, 29, 1–24.
Chiluwa, I. (2009). The discourse of digital deceptions and ‘419’ emails. Discourse Studies, 11, 635–660.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100, 23–41.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2005). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In H. F. M. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 241–278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. L. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow: Longman.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.
Foucault, M. (2002). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). An invitation to social construction (2nd. ed.). London: Sage.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Guise, J., McVittie, C., & McKinlay, A. (2010). A discourse analytic study of ME/CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) sufferers’ experiences of interactions with doctors. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 426–435.
Hepworth, J., McVittie, C., Schofield, T., Lindsay, J., Germov, J. & Leontini, R. (2016). ‘Just choose the easy option’: Students’ talk about alcohol use and social influence. Journal of Youth Studies, 19, 251–268.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2013). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Horne, J., & Wiggins, S. (2009). Doing being 'on the edge': Managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31, 170–184.
Horton-Salway, M. (2001). Narrative identities and the management of personal accountability in Talk about ME: A discursive approach to illness narrative. Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 247–259.
Hurley, A. L., Sullivan, P., & McCarthy, J. (2007). The construction of self in online support groups for victims of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 859–874.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Leary, M. R., & Tangney, J. P. (2003). The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 3–14). London: Guilford Press.
McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2007). Locals, incomers and intra-national migration: Place-identities and a Scottish island. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 171–190.
McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2008). Social psychology and discourse. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
McVittie, C., McKinlay, A., & Widdicombe, S. (2008). Passive and active non-employment: age, employment and the identities of older non-working people. Journal of Aging Studies, 22, 248–255.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Ed.: Morris, C.W.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Myers, D., Abell, J., & Sani, F. (2014). Social psychology (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Onorato, R. S., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Fluidity in the self-concept: The shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 257–278.
Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
Parker, I. (2014). Critical discursive practice in social psychology. In N. Bozatzis & T. Dragonas (Eds.), The discursive turn in social psychology (pp. 190–204). Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications.
Potter, J. (2003). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14, 783–794.
Potter, J. (2012). Re-reading Discourse and Social Psychology: Transforming social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 436–455.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Sampson, E. E. (1993). Celebrating the other: A dialogic account of human nature. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Taylor, S., & Littleton, K. (2012). Contemporary identities of creativity and creative work. Farnham: Ashgate.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford & New York: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and development. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Sage.
Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organisation of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Xanthopoulou, P. (2010). The production of ‘defectiveness’ as a linguistic resource in broadcast evangelical discourse: A discursive psychology approach. Discourse & Society, 21, 675–691.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McVittie, C., McKinlay, A. (2017). The Self. In: Gough, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51017-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51018-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)