Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to critically discuss the research interview in adult mental health by examining the ways in which discourse studies can further contribute to the understanding of research practice. Importantly, research practice is conceptualised here as an object of study in itself, in that it produces subjects and has effects. In other words, the practice of using the research interview simultaneously enacts a method of data collection and creates a re-presentation of interviewees’ accounts that reproduce, maintain, or transform dominant psychological thinking about humans and health (or adult mental health). The ways we practise as researchers, therefore, are inseparable from the findings that are produced. In this chapter, we explore existing critical considerations about the research interview, several problems and possibilities that discourse studies encounter in health research, and what implications there are for education and research practice to inform the research interview in adult mental health.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abell, J., Locke, A., Condor, S., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). Trying similarity, doing difference: The role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 221–244.
Ali, S., Stone, M. A., Peters, J. L., Davies, M. J., & Khunti, K. (2006). The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 23(11), 1165–1173.
Askew, D. A., Vatcharavongvan, P., Hepworth, J., Williams, G., Jackson, C. L., & Marley, J. (2011). Health status of Thai migrants in Brisbane: Findings from a cross-sectional investigation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 35(6), 574–575.
British Psychological Society. (2014). Standards for the accreditation of undergraduate, conversion and integrated Masters programmes in psychology, October 2014. Leicester: British Psychological Society. As retrieved 15 March 2014 from http://www.bps.org.uk /system/files/Public%20files/PaCT/undergraduate_accreditation_2014_web.pdf.
Comer, R., Gould, E., & Furnham, A. (Eds.) (2013). Psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
Condor, S., Figgou, L., Abell, J., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). ‘They’re not racist... ’ Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 441–462.
Cresswell, J. (2014). Research design (4th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fryer, D. (1987). Monmouthshire and marienthal: Sociographies of two unemployed communities. In D. Fryer & P. Ullah (Eds.), Unemployed people: Social and psychological perspectives (pp. 1–73). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Fryer, D., & McCormack, C. (2012). The war without bullets: Socio-structural violence from a critical standpoint. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 3(1), 88–92.
Funk, L. M., & Stajduhar, K. I. (2009). Interviewing family caregivers: Implications of the caregiving context for the research interview. Qualitative Health Research, 19(6), 859–867.
Ghane, S., Kolk, A. M., & Emmelkamp, P. M.G. (2010). Assessment of explanatory models of mental illness: Effects of patient and interviewer characteristics. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(2), 175–182.
Griffin, C. (2007). Being dead and being there: Research interviews, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing ‘naturally occurring data’. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 246–269.
—. (2012). Looking beyond the text: Some reflections on the challenges of engaging with feminist conversation analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 298–302.
Gubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A., Marvastii, A. B., & McKinney, K.D. (Eds.) (2012). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hepburn, A. (2000). On the alleged incompatibility between relativism and feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 10(1), 91–106.
Hepworth, J. (1999). Gender and the capacity of women with NIDDM to implement medical advice. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 27(4), 260–266.
Hepworth, J., Askew, D., Jackson, C., & Russell, A. (2012). ‘Working with the team’: An exploratory study of improved type 2 diabetes management in a new model of integrated primary/secondary care. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 19(3), 207–212.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.) (2003). Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hugh-Jones, S., Madill, A., Gibson, S., Keane, K., & Beestin, L. (2012). A national survey of qualitative research methods teaching in UK HE psychology departments. Leeds: University of Leeds. As retrieved 17 February 2015 at: http://www.academia.edu/8483353 /HughJones_S._Madill_A._et_al._2012_._A_national_survey_of_qualitative_research _methods_teaching_in_UK_HE_psychology_departments._QMiP_Report.
Kirkwood, S., McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2013). ‘They’re more than animals’: Refugees’ accounts of racially motivated violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 747–762.
McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2008). Social psychology and discourse. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
—. (2011). Identities in context: Individuals and discourse in action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
McVittie, C., Cavers, D., & Hepworth, J., (2005). Femininity, mental weakness, and difference: Male students account for anorexia nervosa in males. Sex Roles, 53(5/6), 413–418.
McVittie, C., McKinlay, A., Della Sala, S., & Macpherson, S. (2014). The dog that didn’t growl: The interactional negotiation of momentary confabulations. Memory, 22(7), 824–838.
Miczo, N. (2003). Beyond the ‘Fetishism of Words’: Considerations on the use of the interview to gather chronic illness narratives. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 469–490.
Mishler, E. (1984). The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of medicalinterviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Mallozzi, C.A. (2009). Voicing the interview. A researcher’s exploration on a platform of empathy. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(6), 1042–1060.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 281–307.
—. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (2nd edition) (pp. 555–570). London: Sage.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
Radley, A. R. (1994). Making sense of illness. The social psychology of health and disease. London: Sage.
Radley, A., & Billig, M. (1996). Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18(2), 220–240.
Rapley, T. (2001). The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analyzing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 303–323.
Roulston, K. (2010). Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research, 10(2), 199–228.
Roulston, K., deMarrais, K., & Lewis, J. B. (2003). Learning to interview in the social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4), 643–668.
Seymour-Smith, S., & Wetherell, M. (2006). ‘What he hasn’t told you...’: Investigating the micro-politics of gendered support in heterosexual couples’ co-constructed accounts of illness. Feminism & Psychology, 16(1), 105–127.
Siddiqui, S. (2014). Depression in type 2 diabetes mellitus — A brief review. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 8(1), 62–65.
Speer, S. A. (2012). Feminist conversation analysis: who needs it? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 292–297.
Stokoe, E. (2010). ‘I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women. Discourse & Society, 21(1), 59–82.
Suzuki, L. A., Ahluwalia, M. K., Arora, A. K., & Mattis, J. S. (2007). The pond you fish in determines the fish you catch: Exploring strategies for qualitative data collection. Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 295–327.
Talmy, S. (2011). The interview as collaborative achievement: Interaction, identity, and ideology in a speech event. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 25–42.
Tang, N. (2002). Interviewer and interviewee relationships between women. Sociology, 36(3), 703–721.
Taylor, B., & Francis, K. (2013). Qualitative research in the health sciences. Oxford: Routledge.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2010). Gloucester: The quality assurance agency for higher education. As retrieved 11 December 2014 at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Psychology.pdf.
Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2011). Ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative research [85 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2), Art. 30, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn::nbn:de0114-fqs0902307.
Weatherall, A. (2012). Conversation analysis as feminist research: A response to Whelan. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 303–308.
Whelan, P. (2012). Glossing conversation analysis with feminism? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 309–313.
Recommended reading
• Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research (2nd edition) (pp. 555–570). London: Sage.
• Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2011). Ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative research [85 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2), Art. 30, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn::nbn:de0114-fqs0902307.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Julie Hepworth and Chris McVittie
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hepworth, J., McVittie, C. (2016). The Research Interview in Adult Mental Health: Problems and Possibilities for Discourse Studies. In: O’Reilly, M., Lester, J.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69789-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49685-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)